Sleep
Melatoninand Sleep
All three sources here measured higher sleep.
How sure anyone can be
Moderate certainty, level 3 of 4Further research may change this.
The most certain of the three findings here; each record carries its own.
The numbers reported
One source’s range, drawn against its own line of no difference and scaled to its own numbers.
0.120.22 standardised effect size0.32
This range stays on one side of the no-difference line.
Three sources, newest first
What we read is the published abstract, not the full paper, so a blank below may still be printed in the paper itself. A person went through the criteria and recorded which brought the rating down. Their reasons are not on record here.
Systematic review, 2013 · 1,683 participants
Moderate certainty, level 3 of 4Meta-analysis: melatonin for the treatment of primary sleep disorders.
Ferracioli-Oda E, Qawasmi A, Bloch MH. Meta-Analysis: Melatonin for the Treatment of Primary Sleep Disorders. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e63773. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063773. PMID:23691095.
- Number reported
- 0.22 standardised effect size
- Which way it went
- Higher
- Likely range
- 0.12 to 0.32
- Source’s own words
- standardised effect size sleep quality; sleep latency average difference -7.06 min; total sleep time average difference 8.25 min
- Who was studied
- Adult
- Compared with
- placebo
- Amount taken
- Not in the abstract
- For how long
- Not in the abstract
- Disagreement between studies
- Not in the abstract
- Kind of record
- Meta-analysis
How this rating was reachedstarts at High, one step down: imprecision
- Starts at High
- Imprecision brought it down to ModerateThe reason for this step is not on record here.
- Ends at ModerateOne step down.
- Not written down for this rating
- risk of bias, indirectness and inconsistency
Imprecision stops at the first check that applies; others may apply too.
Signed & machine-rechecked — a person signed the exact source records, and the software re-derived this rating from them and got the same answer.
Randomised trial, 2010
Moderate certainty, level 3 of 4Nightly treatment of primary insomnia with prolonged release melatonin for 6 months: a randomized placebo controlled trial on age and endogenous melatonin as predictors of efficacy and safety.
Wade AG, Ford I, Crawford G, McConnachie A, Nir T, Laudon M, et al. Nightly treatment of primary insomnia with prolonged release melatonin for 6 months: a randomized placebo controlled trial on age and endogenous melatonin as predictors of efficacy and safety. BMC Med. 2010;8:51. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-51. PMID:20712869.
- Number reported
- -17.4
- Which way it went
- Higher
- Likely range
- Not in the abstract
- Source’s own words
- minutes placebo-adjusted sleep-latency change in elderly patients
- Who was studied
- Adult
- Compared with
- placebo
- Amount taken
- Not in the abstract
- For how long
- Not in the abstract
- Disagreement between studies
- Not in the abstract
- Kind of record
- Randomised controlled trial
How this rating was reachedstarts at High, one step down: imprecision
- Starts at High
- Imprecision brought it down to ModerateThe reason for this step is not on record here.
- Ends at ModerateOne step down.
- Not written down for this rating
- risk of bias, indirectness and inconsistency
Imprecision stops at the first check that applies; others may apply too.
Signed & machine-rechecked — a person signed the exact source records, and the software re-derived this rating from them and got the same answer.
Systematic review, 2005
Moderate certainty, level 3 of 4Effects of exogenous melatonin on sleep: a meta-analysis.
Brzezinski A, Vangel MG, Wurtman RJ, Norrie G, Zhdanova I, Ben-Shushan A, et al. Effects of exogenous melatonin on sleep: a meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2005;9(1):41-50. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2004.06.004. PMID:15649737.
- Number reported
- -4
- Which way it went
- Higher
- Likely range
- Not in the abstract
- Source’s own words
- minutes sleep-onset latency reduction
- Who was studied
- Adult
- Compared with
- placebo
- Amount taken
- Not in the abstract
- For how long
- Not in the abstract
- Disagreement between studies
- Not in the abstract
- Kind of record
- Meta-analysis
How this rating was reachedstarts at High, one step down: imprecision
- Starts at High
- Imprecision brought it down to ModerateThe reason for this step is not on record here.
- Ends at ModerateOne step down.
- Not written down for this rating
- risk of bias, indirectness and inconsistency
Imprecision stops at the first check that applies; others may apply too.
Signed & machine-rechecked — a person signed the exact source records, and the software re-derived this rating from them and got the same answer.
What is still missing from these readings
- Two give no likely range, so how precise those numbers are is unknown.
- Two do not say how many people took part.
- Amount taken — Not in the abstract.
- For how long — Not in the abstract.
Something nobody wrote down is never a zero and never a guess.
Still to read for Melatonin
Two of the ten things on our list for Melatonin have no reading here yet:
- Body Temperature
- Serum cortisol (morning)
Still to read means nobody here has got to it, not that it was tried and did nothing or that no research exists. A pairing on no list is not a gap: we never set out to read it.
Read next
Melatonin
Eight other questions read for it
Sleep
28 questions read under it
Sleep
Two other ingredients read against it
Alphabetical, and by nothing else.
This is a library, not advice. No recommendation, no dose, no diagnosis, no ranking. We never ask about your symptoms, and nothing here is tailored to you.