Skip to the main content
Open WellbeingWhat the studies actually measured

Vitamin and mineral levels

Biotin (vitamin B7)and Pyruvate carboxylase activity

Only one source here so far, and it measured higher pyruvate carboxylase activity.

How sure anyone can be

Very low certainty, level 1 of 4

Any estimate here is very uncertain.

The numbers reported

No number has been put on this yet. One source recorded only which way the numbers went — for now, that is all we have here.

One source, newest first

What we read is the published abstract, not the full paper, so a blank below may still be printed in the paper itself. A fixed rule worked this out from the source’s own fields. Nobody checked this rating by hand.

  • Another kind of study, 2004

    Very low certainty, level 1 of 4

    Effects of biotin on pyruvate carboxylase, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, propionyl-CoA carboxylase, and markers for glucose and lipid homeostasis in type 2 diabetic patients and nondiabetic subjects.

    Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(2):238-43. doi:10.1093/ajcn/79.2.238. PMID:14749229.

    Number reported
    Not in the abstract
    Which way it went
    Higher
    Likely range
    Not in the abstract
    Source’s own words
    not reported (direction and significance only)
    Who was studied
    Adult with type 2 diabetes
    Compared with
    none (open-label before-after)
    Amount taken
    6.14 µmol/d
    For how long
    14 to 28 days
    Disagreement between studies
    Not in the abstract
    Kind of record
    Journal article
    How this rating was reachedstarts at Low, 2 steps down: risk of bias and imprecision
    1. Starts at Low
    2. Risk of bias brought it down to Very lowthe abstract reports no risk-of-bias or quality appraisal, so study limitations cannot be ruled outNot in the abstract
    3. Imprecision — already at Very low, the lowest rungthe abstract reports no confidence interval for the estimateNot in the abstract
    4. Ends at Very low2 steps down.
    Checked, nothing to step it down for
    indirectness
    Inconsistency
    One study, so there was nothing to disagree

    Imprecision stops at the first check that applies; others may apply too.

    AI review could not confirm it — an AI agent re-read this finding against the saved source and at least one check failed. The batch record names the check and quotes the sentence that caused the doubt. No person read it.

    Read the abstract on PubMed

What is still missing from these readings

  • No number at all, only which way it went.
  • One gives no likely range, so how precise that number is is unknown.
  • One do not say how many people took part.

Something nobody wrote down is never a zero and never a guess.

Still to read for Biotin (vitamin B7)

Four of the 13 things on our list for Biotin (vitamin B7) have no reading here yet:

  • Fasting insulin
  • Hair growth rate
  • Hepatic Fat Fraction
  • Vitamin B7 (Biotin)

Still to read means nobody here has got to it, not that it was tried and did nothing or that no research exists. A pairing on no list is not a gap: we never set out to read it.

Read next

This is a library, not advice. No recommendation, no dose, no diagnosis, no ranking. We never ask about your symptoms, and nothing here is tailored to you.