Skip to the main content

Heart and blood pressure

Boronand Blood oxygen saturation (SpO2)

Only one source here so far, and it measured higher blood oxygen saturation (SpO2).

How sure anyone can be

Low certainty, level 2 of 4

Further research is likely to change this.

The numbers reported

No number has been put on this yet. One source recorded only which way the numbers went — for now, that is all we have here.

One source, newest first

What we read is the published abstract, not the full paper, so a blank below may still be printed in the paper itself. A fixed rule worked this out from the source’s own fields. Nobody checked this rating by hand.

  • Randomised trial, 2022

    Low certainty, level 2 of 4

    Possible therapeutic effects of boron citrate and oleoylethanolamide supplementation in patients with COVID-19: A pilot randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.

    J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2022;71:126945. doi:10.1016/j.jtemb.2022.126945. PMID:35183882.

    Number reported
    Not in the abstract
    Which way it went
    Higher
    Likely range
    Not in the abstract
    Source’s own words
    Not in the abstract
    Who was studied
    Adult with covid19
    Compared with
    routine treatment without study medication
    Amount taken
    10 mg/d boron citrate (5 mg twice daily)
    For how long
    Not in the abstract
    Disagreement between studies
    Not in the abstract
    Kind of record
    Journal article
    How this rating was reachedstarts at High, 2 steps down: risk of bias and imprecision
    1. Starts at High
    2. Risk of bias brought it down to Moderatethe abstract reports no risk-of-bias or quality appraisal, so study limitations cannot be ruled outNot in the abstract
    3. Imprecision brought it down to Lowthe abstract reports no confidence interval for the estimateNot in the abstract
    4. Ends at Low2 steps down.
    Checked, nothing to step it down for
    indirectness
    Inconsistency
    One study, so there was nothing to disagree

    Imprecision stops at the first check that applies; others may apply too.

    AI review could not confirm it — an AI agent re-read this finding against the saved source and at least one check failed. The batch record names the check and quotes the sentence that caused the doubt. No person read it.

    Read the abstract on PubMed

What is still missing from these readings

  • No number at all, only which way it went.
  • One gives no likely range, so how precise that number is is unknown.
  • One do not say how many people took part.
  • For how long — Not in the abstract.

Something nobody wrote down is never a zero and never a guess.

Still to read for Boron

Six of the 15 things on our list for Boron have no reading here yet:

  • Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
  • Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)
  • Phosphate (Inorganic Phosphorus)
  • Respiratory rate
  • Serum magnesium
  • White blood cell count

Still to read means nobody here has got to it, not that it was tried and did nothing or that no research exists. A pairing on no list is not a gap: we never set out to read it.

Read next

  • Boron

    Eight other questions read for it

  • Heart and blood pressure

    49 questions read under it

  • Blood oxygen saturation (SpO2)

    No other ingredients read against it

    Alphabetical, and by nothing else.

This is a library, not advice. No recommendation, no dose, no diagnosis, no ranking. We never ask about your symptoms, and nothing here is tailored to you.